药片's profile糖果的天空PhotosBlogListsMore Tools Help

Blog


    October 05

    90%的玄机

    有这样一道数学题;90%ⅹ90%ⅹ90%ⅹ90%ⅹ90%=?结果是59%
    如果抛开简单的数学意义,这个等式说明什么问题?
    从小到大,无数次应付过各种考试的我们都知道,60分是及格线,100分似乎比较难,而90分是一个可以引以为豪的分数了。工作中也是如此,很多人认为把工作做到60%太危险,会被公司炒鱿鱼;做到100%太辛苦,也不太现实;把工作做到90%就很不错了。这种说法视乎很有道理,但工作的过程是由一个一个细微的环节串联而成的,每个环节为基础,各个环节之间相互影响的关系以乘法为基准最终产生结果,而不是百分比的简单叠加。环环相扣的一系列过程结束后,很不错90分最终带来的结果可能是59----一个不及格的分数,这就是过程控制效应。
     
    一个集约化的现代经营过程需要经过构思、策划、设计、讨论、修改、实施、反馈、再修正等诸多环节。如果你不能在每个环节认真对待,对每一个环节及时反馈何修正,不致力于每一个环节的完美,而是想当然地认为结果不会有太大问题,那么最终的结局可能就是这个环节你做到了90%,下一个环节还是90%,在5个环节之后,你的工作成绩就不是平均值90%,而是59%-------一个会被激烈的竞争环境淘汰的分数。在有些情况下可能还会低于这个分数,甚至变成负数!到了这个时候,你再回过头来按照100%的标准进行检修。就可能意味着整个项目、整个工程都需要推到重来,意味着时间和资源的浪费,意味着效率低下和错失时机,意味着先前的努力付诸东流。90%ⅹ90%ⅹ90%ⅹ90%ⅹ90%=59%,这个简单的等式数学之外的意义就是-——执行过程不能打折

     

    Comments (1)

    Please wait...
    Sorry, the comment you entered is too long. Please shorten it.
    You didn't enter anything. Please try again.
    Sorry, we can't add your comment right now. Please try again later.
    To add a comment, you need permission from your parent. Ask for permission
    Your parent has turned off comments.
    Sorry, we can't delete your comment right now. Please try again later.
    You've exceeded the maximum number of comments that can be left in one day. Please try again in 24 hours.
    Your account has had the ability to leave comments disabled because our systems indicate that you may be spamming other users. If you believe that your account has been disabled in error please contact Windows Live support.
    Complete the security check below to finish leaving your comment.
    The characters you type in the security check must match the characters in the picture or audio.

    To add a comment, sign in with your Windows Live ID (if you use Hotmail, Messenger, or Xbox LIVE, you have a Windows Live ID). Sign in


    Don't have a Windows Live ID? Sign up

    Sunnywrote:
    复杂来~~~
    Oct. 6

    Trackbacks

    The trackback URL for this entry is:
    http://rainsym.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!1F6F3608ACC3DC09!392.trak
    Weblogs that reference this entry
    • None